As Woody Allen said, the heart wants what it wants. So, why are you here?
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Monday, April 27, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Contracts make everything ridiculous again.
Long before shooting ever begins on movies, agents haggle out "billing" for their clients. This basically means that whenever there's promotional material of any kind that mention the actor's name (posters, trailers, opening title sequences, etc.), the actors have to be listen in a certain order. Getting "top billing" on a movie means that you're listed first, regardless - and this is important - regardless of whether or not that's an advisable option. And that's how we get stuff like this:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a9a/76a9abc81be158834d0c00da0bc08e0fc051e1e6" alt=""
This is especially funny when you consider what we know about what teams Rodriguez and Diesel play for. You have to wonder why the photographer and designer didn't say to themselves "y'know, I bet Diesel has top billing in this movie, so we should probably put them in order from left to right." Speaking of the photographer, is it just me, or is Michelle Rodriguez rather cross-eyed in this picture?
I tried to find other examples of this online, certain that there'd be a website devoted to this phenomenon, but couldn't find much. If anyone finds one, let me know, please. Here's a couple examples I did find, though, since it happens more often in ensemble casts with big egos:
And sometimes even in ensemble casts with big egos and almost no talent at all. To be fair, though, other than Seth Green being considerably shorter, who can really tell these guys apart?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1712a/1712a50cf11980ccd6ffe281e2ec90d7c7f3a132" alt=""
And, finally, this similarly-postered and extremely well-titled Showtime series.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24ebe/24ebefebcd17a1b152b49304b145c3fdde59d0aa" alt=""
In the olden days, who got top billing made a huge difference in terms of the poster. In The Towering Inferno, Steve McQueen, William Holden, and Paul Newman were all battling over top billing. The studio decided that Holden wasn't a big enough star anymore to get top billing, so it was between McQueen and Newman (this wouldn't be the last time the issue would emerge between them - McQueen would later drop out of Butch Cassidy since he wasn't going to get top billing over Newman in the movie). The studio compromised by putting McQueen on the lower left and Newman on the upper right, so depending on whether you read it from the top down or from left to right, there was a different star with "top billing."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac1f/dac1ff17738e52e1219e4864811f28751e56e1c6" alt=""
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to go see what Vin Diesel really looks like in Fast and Furious.
Labels: billing, movie, out of order, poster, top billing
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Who's Excited For Midseason Replacements? I See That Hand!
TV promos happen three times a year. And the first time is okay. It's at the tail end of the summer, you're bored and ready for the TV season to start, and the networks know this. And so - bam! - a glut of promos, reminding you to return to the show you always loved. There'll be one or two new shows mixed in on each network, all of which will be referred to as "this season's breakout hit," often before they actually air and regardless of how terrible they debut in the ratings. NBC is particularly shameless about this, since any show that manages to finish fourth - out of four networks - is actually considered to be "exceeding expectations." I don't know what failing to meet expectations would look like. You'd probably have to be beat out by a number of different channels, including Oxygen and the Golf Channel.A few of these breakout hits will win actual viewers and manage to stick it out through the whole season (this year it was just 'Fringe' and 'The Mentalist,' now that I think 'Kath and Kim' has mercifully breathed its last), where they will often remain being called "the year's breakout hit" well into their third season.
The third time promos come out (I'll swing back around to the second time in a second), it's excruciating. It's the tail end of the TV season. Everyone is tuned in to watch the season finale - what crazy cliffhanger will the season end on this year? (P.S. I'm now taking two-to-one odds on 'Desperate Housewives' killing yet another cast member. That show has lost it.) And then it hits you - a glut of promos for The Summer Programming. It's awful. There's always some crazy new reality show that you cannot escape from. It's always hosted by the worst possible fading celebrity to see a lot of in a short time span (this year's prediction: Heidi Montag) and features some gimmick that you can't imagine anyone watching ("come see how many poodles it takes to successfully defeat these Olympic swimmers in mud wrestling!"), and yet it somehow succeeds, so that next summer, you have to watch the promos for the show all over again, only this time there's twice as many of them as they herald that this season will take it to "the next level." ("Who's better at sand castles? Stephen Hawking, or this grizzly bear? Jason Alexander joins Heidi, Spencer, and the Octomom as a guest judge!"). And the worst part about it is that turning off your television does nothing. You go on the internet and "hilarious clips" pop up everywhere. You drive past billboards on the highway with the giant quasi-celebrities grinning down at you. You dare to talk to that co-worker who loves reality TV, and you end up hounded to death about the show all summer. It's inescapable.
The second time TV promos come out, however, is not bad. That's the mid-season, show-replacement promos. Every new TV season features a number of new shows that don't work out - this year we had 'Crusoe,' 'Valentine,' 'My Own Worst Enemy,' 'Kath and Kim,' 'Opportunity Knocks,' 'Life On Mars,' 'In Harm's Way,' 'Homeland Security USA,' 'Hole In The Wall,' 'The Ex List,' 'Easy Money,' 'Do Not Disturb,' 'The Chopping Block,' 'America's Toughest Jobs,' and '4Real.' If you ever question how good TV executives are at their job, consider this: how many of those shows have you actually heard of? Exactly.
Of course, sometimes there are good shows that just never quite get a leg up, right? Television Without Pity has a "Brilliant But Canceled" list of the good ones, but I'll just give you the short version: the only show among those that was any good was 'Life On Mars.' The only shows in that list that seemed at any point to have the smallest amount of potential were 'Life On Mars,' 'Valentine,' and.... that's it. Ough.
Fortunately, we've got a slate of brilliant shows that somehow weren't good enough to premiere at the start of the season, so we're all set, right? But which of the horde of promos for shows that seem to have some sort of vague potential do I watch? It's so difficult to decide...
That's why I'm here, dear reader. That's why I'm here.
Incredibly, in the midst of a television season that has gone terribly awry (older shows dying off, newer shows sputtering and stalling) thanks almost entirely to a writer's strike that has managed to completely decimate two consecutive television seasons, there are a number of bright lights on the horizon. I have watched every single new show to premiere this new season, and I am here to tell you what's worth it and what's not (my word is law, people. Disobey at your peril).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a183/8a183fe59ffa1ecea0e96b9bf9d0fffb96af76ac" alt=""
2. 'Castle' (ABC) - I'm a little torn about this one. The show's not bad, overall, it's just a bad show that happens to have a uniquely talented lead (a pitch-perfect Nathan Fillion, looking for all the world like he's having the time of his life) and little else going for it. It's worth watching if it's on, but there's no point in sticking around: the show runners will gradually bring the two leads together, there'll be banter and winking and one-liners everywhere, and the season will end on either a will-they or won't they note, or it'll be one of those cliffhangers where someone kidnaps Fillion's daughter (Molly Quinn, a revelation of a child actor who hopefully will find better work elsewhere) and we get to see Fillion's quote-unquote dark side. Meh.
3. 'In The Motherhood' (ABC) - Oh, ABC. You're trying so hard and failing so dramatically - you've got only three shows that anyone watches ('Dancing With The Stars,' 'Lost,' and 'Desperate Housewives'), and you keep popping out show after terrible show. With 'Motherhood,' the question isn't if it's bad. The only question is, "could it be worse?" Apparently it couldn't: ABC will almost certainly announcing it's cancellation sometime in the next few weeks, and I can stop making sure I have my remote always in hand lest a promo for this show appear while I'm watching something else.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4979/c497922a0bde26d91201f8671d10a009b1aeddee" alt=""
Edit: ABC announced today that it'll be bumping 'Cupid' this week in order to show two episodes of 'The Unusuals.' Gotta be a good sign.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18062/1806299045a5e0d8d9a13c81876f5ccde696fc30" alt=""
6. 'Howie Do It' (NBC) - The name along gives me hives. Let's just move on.
7. 'Parks and Recreation' (NBC) - I want so much to like it. A pack of actors I really like (Amy Poehler, Rashida Jones, Paul Schneider, the suddenly ubiquitous Aziz Ansari), plus the people who made 'The Office' are behind it... but it just doesn't seem to fulfill its vast potential. Still, I think it's one of those shows that could get better as it continues its stretch - Schneider in particular seems to be finding a rhythm early on - so keep half an eye on it. But don't bother to move your schedule around to catch it. It's not worth it - yet.
8. 'Kings' (NBC) - It's already been canceled. Sorry, fellas. Thanks for playing. It woulda been great to have Ian McShane on network TV every week, though, right? Too bad.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9287a/9287a1bd6490d2ef19869b8565bc208ce825f078" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b61c4/b61c40a6b4b24cb0ffe84f8a94d9c251b4b50e5f" alt=""
11. Sit Down, Shut Up (FOX) - Even if you loved 'Arrested Development,' it's still not worth it. That's right a show by all the same people who created my number-two all-time favorite show (behind 'The West Wing') is not worth watching. That's how bad it is.
12. The Osbournes Reloaded (FOX) - (insert suicide-by-shotgun joke here)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40439/404391fa006181f08fd75a21227febd16b318d47" alt=""
1. Drink whenever it cuts away to closeup a subject doing something - fidgeting a hand, arching an eyebrow, flaring their nostrils, etc - and then it cuts back to Tim Roth furrowing his brow. Take two drinks if he turns to the person next to him and says 'we better keep him in custody,' or 'let's search the house.' Take three drinks if he exclaims 'he's lying!'
2. Drink whenever they are showing pictures of the subject frowning or furrowing his brow, and "the computer" puts up images of celebrities doing the same thing, to show how accurate the show is.
For Extreme Alcoholics Only:
3. Drink every time Tim Roth furrows his brow at another actor during a scene and jumps on top of his line, as if to say "Watch yourself. I was in Reservoir Dogs, dammit."
14. 'Harper's Island' (CBS) - I'm a complete pansy and haven't watched a single episode. Even the promos scare me. You'll have to make up your own mind. This may help you: nobody else tuned in after that first episode. It probably won't make it to the end of its run.
Hope that helps. Here's a quick report card:
1. 'Cupid' - C-
2. 'Castle' - B-
3. 'In The Motherhood' - D-
4. 'The Unusuals' - B+
5. Better Off Ted - B+
6. 'Howie Do It' - F
7. 'Parks and Recreation' - B-
8. 'Kings' - C
9. 'Southland' - B+
10. 'Dollhouse' - B-
11. 'Sit Down, Shut Up' - C-
12. 'The Osbournes Reloaded' - D-
13. 'Lie To Me' - D+ (Unintentional Comedic Value Grade - B+)
14. 'Harper's Island' - Absent
If they're lucky, maybe five of those shows will get a pickup for next year. I'm predicting that at most, Lie To Me, Castle, Southland, Parks and Recreation, Better of Ted, and The Unusuals (in that order) all make it through, and everything else dies. Let's see what survives.
Labels: better off ted, lie to me, midseason, promos, replacements, southland, tv shows, unusuals
Friday, April 10, 2009
Rock-A-Doodle
That Guy With Glasses (the guy who invented 5 Second Movies) is also doing Nostalgia Reviews of movies he watched when he was a kid, so you don't have to re-watch them. His most recent one was Rock-A-Doodle, a movie with plot holes so gigantic that, 18 years later, I'm still bothered by them (I was seven!) My dad took me to this for some reason. I had evidently done something horrible.Labels: rock-a-doodle
Thursday, April 09, 2009
20 Shots That Must Be Retired From Cinema
Thought this was brilliant. I might make my own list later.The Greatest Nike Commercial Of All Time.
Someone asked me the other day what the greatest Nike commercial of all time was. I hadn't realized it was up for debate. It is, of course, this one by German director Ralf Schmerberg, called "Bottled Courage":Other competitors would be Spike Jonze's "Y2K Jogger":
Or Tiger Wood's "Never" commercial, in which the late Earl Woods (he died of cancer a few years ago) talks about raising Tiger to be the best. It's by, I think, Hal Curtis. This one is a big of a crier:
This one is by far the coolest of the commercials - a three-minute, stone-brilliant soccer commercial/short film from Guy Ritchie called "Take It To The Next Level":
Am I missing any that should be in competition here?
Labels: greatest, nike commercial